Saturday, March 5, 2016

My View about The Da Vinci Code Novel by Dan Brown.



         Here My View about The Da Vinci Code Novel by Dan Brown. 

The Da Vinci Code ‘Dan Drown’ was American author of trailer fiction. Here mentions many pre-christen Religious.




                      Here also we saw the movie starring with female character Sophia. Sophie’s search for what her Grandfather wanted to tell her, is the second narration, Robert Langdon’s revelations, are the part of the third narration in the novel in also conception of the ancient and transition to the modern has been shifted towards gender. Mostly critical, refuting the novel's treatment of biblical and Church history or many things around to spirituality of Christianity. Here Also observe that Brown is trying to prove that Mary Magdalene was the favourite of all the disciples of Christ. Christ’s intention like Jesus Christ Intention that Church be based from her and built it by peter. The concept about feminine divinity.      

In this Point Dan Brown novel is many issue grain to extremely way to new way to portrayal of thinking. Blood, Holy Grails on which Brown draws heavily. The novel certainly has something for everyone, and too much for many of us, a fast-moving murder story; puzzles, riddles, and anagrams; art historical mysteries; and multiple conspiracy theories, concerning for example the secret identity of the Holy Grail, the secret society the Priory of Sion.  This Article also describing that 'In the end, Dan Brown has penned a poorly written, atrociously researched mess. So, why bother with such a close reading of a worthless novel? The answer is simple: The Da Vinci Code takes esoteric mainstream.

We have studied that Brown’s novel got success due to a talent yearning in today’s world for a representations of the Scared Feminine. There Paddies Lost in woman as a sin causer or Eve is responsible fall of man but according to my view there all are genre narrative style or structure of different way to present time of woman power or responsibility. Also portrayal of sex and art to cultural behind the contrivers’ statement of writer.

The Narration of Biblical to humanity about construct to human mind or thinking. No I thinks that Paradise Lost or Dan Brown novel not harm humanity but they relays that history behind human kind nature or thinking about own identity of human.  
Yes this novel critical represent of deconstruct idea of thinking of God or Religious. Here when watch the movie that like Lea Tebing interpret the Christian or also Misrepresentations of Marry Magdalene as a conspiracy to suppress her importance.  E.g. like Some Other Movie to attract new idea of religious of Hindu religious. As Like Movie OMG….DHARM SANKAT MEIN…also I have put trailer video about DHARM SAKT MEIN….

         


Yes many about Hindu religion or culture and by dismantling it, attempts to reconstruct another possible interpretation of truth. The Da Vinci Code Truth-Claims: 
Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and her womb was the Holy Grail. Teabing 
States that: “ Christ Himself Made that Claim.” That Mary Magdalene was the Holy Grail. At the End of novel : Langdon uncover the mystery behind the Mary Magdalene and the Holy Grail also called SANGREAl…



Also Sir Leigh Teabing says that: “ People can’t find the Holy Grail but The Holy Grail find Us’’  Leonardo Da –Vinci was secular instead of religious.
                         
      Traditional reading of the novel ‘The Da Vinci Code’, Robert Langdon, Professor of Religious Symbology, Harvard University emerges as protagonist and Sir Leigh Teabing, a British Historian as antagonist.  In this Point Da Vinci Code protgonnist Symbolically match the Anti- Religious idea of modern look. There can also say that Christy symbol that Pagan way to represent of Dan Brown. Also important thing like some other reading of :
  •         Divinity is challenged
  •          Mortal being rather then divine.
  •         Judaism in Christianity.  

Some Important Statement Like :
“Nothing is Christianity is original’’
“ Pagan to Christianization”

                  Pentacle: (1) Male
                                  (2) Female
                                                     
         Leigh Teabing: British Historian
         Robert Longdon : Religious Symbology







Ann Gray’s three propositions on ‘knowability’ with illustrations from the novel ‘The Da Vinci Code’:

'I know what i don't know'
I don't know what i know' 


  •         Robert Landgdon’t   quest for knowing.
  •         Sophie’s self identification
  •         Teabing’s  quest for knowing
  •         Silas’s illusion about knowing
  •         Holy Grail is alos symbol of knowledge.
                                      We are that concept about know and knowing is vast different of particular things.   It is very difficult to explain this concept of knowability. And we can apply this concept everywhere. Knowledges is very vast concept and one cannot claim that whatever we know is truth.truth are always contrast of knowledge to convince of  related things of how to connect to impression.   


No comments:

Post a Comment